Work
The work behind both offers, as things you can open and use yourself: a course rebuilt in Arabic, the QA report that ships with every build, earlier bilingual work, and a small learning-data demo.
A site safety induction, rebuilt in Arabic
The same course twice: first translated only, then rebuilt. Ninety seconds, no sound needed.
Vantage is a made-up company, and the course was written for this demo.
Open both versions and use them: the translated version and the rebuilt version.
What ships with every build
Every build is tested on the LMS it will run on before handover, and the results go on one page: browsers and devices, SCORM tracking, RTL behaviour, and the known limitations, stated plainly.
It is written for the person who approves the work, who often cannot read the Arabic. This is the full report from the Vantage rebuild.

Earlier bilingual work
One compliance scenario, built in English and in Arabic. Compare the two and look at more than the words.

Reporting a conflict of interest
A short scenario in which the learner spots a conflict of interest and reports it, with voiceover.

The same scenario in Arabic
Adapted rather than translated, laid out right to left, with Arabic voiceover.
The data side
A short video activity that sends xAPI statements to a learning record store as you play, pause, skip and finish. Each action appears in a log on the screen as it is sent, under an anonymous ID.
It shows the raw material that learning reports are built from: what learners actually did, not only whether they finished. Monthly Learning Reporting works on the same kind of record, matched with your HR data.

“Rami Al Sa’di has shown exemplary character and worked at the highest of qualities. He has also shown a high sense of cultural sensitivity in regards to the project client and has displayed excellent linguistic capability.“

Ashraf Nayroukh, CEO, eLearment for Education
Start with a free RTL audit
Send a link to an Arabic course you have already published. You get back a short screen recording walking through what is wrong with it, and a written list of findings.
Asking about Monthly Learning Reporting instead? The same contact page takes both.
